frontend-design-review

Validated 6 Apr 2026 · Repository
75
Good
0 critical
3 warnings
10 suggestions
96 passed
Domain Scores
Anti-Slop
100
Accessibility
100
Enterprise
100
Issues
Warnings (3)
  • 19.2-reviewer-no-criteria Reviewer pattern detected but no evaluation criteria documented line 16
    Fix: Add a criteria section (checklist, rubric, or pass/fail conditions)
  • 19.3-generator-no-output-spec Generator pattern detected but no output format specified line 16
    Fix: Document the output format (template, schema, or example output)
  • 7.6-no-negative-cases Skill lacks negative case coverage (no error handling, limitations, or edge cases documented) line 1
    Fix: Add a '## Limitations' or '## Error Handling' section describing when the skill won't work or how it handles failures
Suggestions (10)
  • 17.1-no-input-contract No input contract found; unclear what data the skill expects line 16
    Fix: Document what the skill expects as input (format, required fields, constraints)
  • 17.2-no-output-contract No output contract found; unclear what the skill produces line 16
    Fix: Document what the skill produces (format, structure, side effects)
  • 14.2-no-examples No input/output examples found line 1
    Fix: Add example input/output pairs or <example> blocks to make the skill testable
  • 14.3-no-binary-verdict Skill has success criteria but no binary pass/fail language line 1
    Fix: Add explicit pass/fail indicators so evaluators reach the same verdict independently
  • 3.4-gerund-naming Skill name could use gerund form for clarity line 2
    Fix: Consider gerund-style names like 'processing-pdfs' or 'analyzing-logs' (per best practices)
  • 18.1-no-confidence-signal No confidence signal found for orchestrator decision-making line 1
    Fix: Add confidence indicators (e.g., confidence: high/medium/low) so orchestrators can route or retry
  • 18.3-no-structured-output No structured output format defined for machine consumption line 1
    Fix: Define a structured output format (JSON, YAML, or table) so downstream tools can parse results
  • 4.2-ambiguous-term Ambiguous term 'appropriate' found line 36
    Fix: Replace with specific, measurable criteria
  • 4.2-ambiguous-term Ambiguous term 'correctly' found line 64
    Fix: Replace with specific, measurable criteria
  • 1.8-unexpected-field Unexpected frontmatter field 'acknowledgments' line 10
    Fix: Remove or move to metadata section. Valid fields: name, version, description, allowed-tools, compatibility, license, metadata
Badges
skillcheck passed skillcheck antislop 100 skillcheck WCAG AA skillcheck WCAG AAA skillcheck enterprise